http://www.cloakanddagger.de presents:
REBUTTAL ARGUMENT:
YES, 270 TONS AND MORE DID FLY SIDEWAYS
By:
Dr. Stefan Grossmann, 1-21-8
Per 1-26-8: Click for Part 2, Video Page (Nuking of the WTC)
1. This is a counter-argument. Reports of mine are under attack. See e-mail by Robert Stockmann to the sender below at the end.
2. Damage in a near-by building (the American Express corporate headquarters, known by various names as World Financial Center building 3, WFC 3, Amex Building) evidences that an estimated several thousand tons of rubble were displaced over 390 feet sideways from the collapsing World Trade Center across a broad avenue. It is physically evident that the cause could only have been a huge explosion.
3. A difficult person, the submitter objecting against my reports, wants to attack FEMA, an official government agency, for publishing the following information (screenshot with URL, archived by me today, on the internet for years):
The submitter, a difficult person, does not like it that the U.S. government agency published a figure telling us that the beam lodged in the nearby building (Amex building) was a „600,000 pound beam” (quote from the FEMA web page). He is complaining to me because I used that figure in reports some years ago.
Hey, can any of you help that guy?
4. When the major bomb explosion destroyed North Tower (WTC 1, closest corner about 400 feet away from the closest corner of the Amex building), an estimated several thousands of tons of debris were blasted sideways and landed in other buildings. This is quite evident from photos on the internet, such as:
Demolition squibbs
Demolition squibbs
Read page 200 of this archive pdf,
Deputy Assistant Chief of Safety Albert Turi,
New York Fire Department – he saw the middle floor
being detonated first, and he tells us (NY Times).
Pentagon Officers Observed Bomb Explosions
Sight Seeing Buses melted from bomb heat
(not kerosene, not fires). See at the right.
A frequently forgotten report by the Insurance Industry:
The damage field had a radius of two miles, see
The government reported this spike in
the Amex building, photo Michael Rieger,
FEMA photograph (see above).
Government estimate: 600,000 pounds.
Questionable?
Answer: If so, but irrelevant. Here is an estimated
several thousands of tons debris worth of damage in the
World Finance Center through 9-11-1:
Notice a whole wing of the Amex building destroyed.
The destroyed wing is beneath the higher floors where
the government reported a 600,000 beam flew in.
The damage on that wing alone looks to me like
thousands of tons of debris from the WTC
were bombed across the highway.
The whole glass Pavillion (Winter Garden) destroyed,
rebuilt over two years for $50 million.
Page 2 of the RMS insurance industry report (pdf above) gives
the Amex building a red zoning for „major damage”.
It took the workers until November 17, 2001 or
not very long prior to that date to remove the
government-reported 600,000 pound beam
from approx. the 20th floor. It is gone on this photo,
November 17, 2001.
Photo above by Rob, cached from:
http://www.pbase.com/rpipe/image/626528
FEMA photo by Andrea Booher, October 4, 2001,
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photolibrary/photo_details.do?id=4250
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photodata/original/4250.jpg
The closest building was WFC 2 (background where the white crane
is pointing). Why was the farther away Amex building (WFC 3, right
background) hit more strongly?
5. Next, the poor submitter wants to deny that the World Trade Center was destroyed through a nuclear device, not necessarily a Hiroshima-type bomb. Isn’t that just ridiculous?
Here’s news for the guy:
a) Does the poor submitter believe what the government lies to us about „raging building fires”? There’s more than 9-11 reasons to doubt this, because it is evident that building fires alone could not, and did not, destroy the World Trade Center. Read this:
CLICK HERE FOR FULL WTC FIRE REPORT (PDF)
b) Does the poor submitter really not know that the World Trade Center was bombed? Read this:
CLICK HERE FOR FULL WTC BOMB REPORT (PDF)
Similar to what General Benton Partin found after the April 19, 1995 nuking of the Oklahoma City courthouse by insiders (and the government crookedly ignored its own General’s diligent report), nuclear residues were found at the WTC by scientists working for the government, see
Elevated Tritium Levels at the WTC
The government’s explanation that „planes” carried the tritium in their emergency „exit” signs and thus contaminated the site is ludicrous – because there were no civilian planes. What we were shown on TV and in photos were models. See research by Marcus Icke.
I like the following evidence best, personally: The entry holes do not match a Boeing 767-200 (the alleged impact aircraft), see
This is good hard evidence that the towers were not hit by civilian planes but were hit by missiles /or call them drones like insider information tells us – such as from inside the FBI with relation to the cruise missile that hit the Pentagon, see:
FBI told German Police Cruise Missile Hit Pentagon
Reference all research. Not to be repeated here.
Audio recordings of the collapse sound tell us that the towers (North Tower example here) did not pancake but that they were flattened like an old hotel through a controlled demolition (in conjunction with a nuclear-type blast, which could technically be remote placed through a HAARP plasma weapon). See article with sound recording:
These are a few of the good reasons not to follow the submitter who is a difficult person (below, tackled in technical terms by Robert).
The E-Mail by a Submitter
with technical counter-argument by Robert Stockmann:
|
|
|
|
|
Per 1-26-8: Click for Part 2, Video Page (Nuking of the WTC)