THE BOGUS
MORE 9-11 FOR
RABID NITWITS
See new hot link per 2007 below!
1. FEMA in its WTC Building Performance Report (Chapter 2, illustration 2-25)
correctly indicates that the left wing of the “plane” would have hit the
extremely sturdy core columns. This would have resulted in a very broad
kerosene splatter angle reaching from the south nearly all the way to the west
(left image, marked green by me in the following FEMA graphic):
Compare this, however, with the narrow tube-shaped southwards explosion
formation as it actually was captured on film and seen on 9-11-1 (right image –
a photograph of the so-called “fireball” at
(According to the size of the fireball, there would have been huge
amounts of fuel in the wing tanks, which reach nearly to the wing tips, and the
left wing would with certainty have collided with a core column as shown in the
FEMA graphic above.)
In stark contrast with the collision trajectory of the fuel in the left
wing, what we see is the narrowly tunneled explosion originating at a point
approximately where I have added the red circle in the left graphic – clearly
not the result of a true plane collision and explosion of its left wing fuel
tank upon impact.
On the south wall, we should be seeing a big “ball” – but in fact we are
seeing a long narrow “pipe” of explosion formation. A tell-tale mark that
pre-planted explosives are going off, not a real “plane”. (The plane N612UA is
btw reported as still being in service today – logical, since it was never
decommissioned and never destroyed.)
This, of course, corresponds with the photographed fact that there was
no real left wing – on many video stills, it is simply missing. It was a
holographic deception called a military camouflage (developed for the
Here is a good expertly background article on “Jet A” kerosene
explosions:
www.aircrash.org/burnelli/pdf/ht960724.pdf
2. The above finding corresponds exactly with another anomaly of south
wall explosion formation:
When planes crash, their „Jet A“ kerosene (or other type of kerosene)
burns with incomplete oxidation, and results in huge clouds of black sooty
smoke. Left is a picture of such a crash from the web site of the
Australian Emergency Management Administration. This sooty black smoke is
accompanied by a relatively small zone where actual hot fires rage, in the
left seen at the center of the nearly black smoke cloud.
Right: The southern explosion formation is light gray in color. (The same
anomaly is seen for The southern explosion formation results from a bomb explosion using
a chemically self-oxidating military explosive that is not dependent on air
stream to supply oxygen; hence no kerosene-typical black sooty smoke forms.
– The difference of the two fireballs is underlined by the vastly different
ratio of their upwards rise.
It is also very strange and unfitting for a “plane” impact that the
majority of the explosive substance appears in all photos to be delivered to
the north side of South Tower (in the photo above right: in the right of the
photo). This would let us assume that there was no core formed of numerous
massive steel core columns in between the collision trajectory and the
resulting explosion formation.
3. In the first place, the explosion of a real plane would have occurred
at the instant of when the wings touched the outer skin of the steel
skyscraper. However, the explosion was delayed for nearly one second and
occurred deep inside the tower. Inexplicable unless the above true explanations
are used: missiles and bombs. And, most important, fuck Bush.
Read more on the bogus Pentagon “airplane”