|
|
|
|
www.cloakanddagger.de presents: |
|
|
|
|
Elevated Tritium Levels at the WTC |
|
By: the U.S. Government, 5-14-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Elevated Tritium Levels at the WTC: |
|
|
http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/product.biblio.jsp?osti_id=799642
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract per the link above: |
|
|
|
|
|
„Traces of tritiated water (HTO) were detected at the World Trade Center (WTC) ground zero after the 9/11/01 terrorist attack. A method of ultralow-background liquid scintillation counting was used after distilling HTO from the samples. A water sample from the WTC sewer, collected on 9/13/01, contained 0.174 plus or minus 0.074 (2s) nCi/L of HTO. A split water sample, collected on 9/21/01 from the basement of WTC Building 6, contained 3.53 plus or minus 0.17 and 2.83 plus or minus 0.15 nCi/L, respectively. Several water and vegetation samples were analyzed from areas outside the ground zero, located in Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, and Kensico Reservoir. No HTO above the background was found in those samples. All these results are well below the levels of concern to human exposure.” |
|
|
|
|
Notes to the Above |
|
|
by Dr. Stefan Grossmann, www.gallerize.com, 5-19-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
1. Elevated tritium levels were already found as
evidence for the mini-nuking of the Alfred P. Murrah federal building in
Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995, see two reports by Sherman H. Skolnick: |
|
|
The Secrets of Timothy McVeigh, 6-15-1 |
|
|
The Overthrow of the American Republic, Part
32, 4-21-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
People tend to forget, so we stress this for
clarity. |
|
|
|
|
|
2. Elevated tritium levels were again found in
the smoldering ruins of the World Trade Center after alleged Arab terrorists
flew alleged passenger planes into the towers in an alleged Muslim terror
attack in the morning of 9-11-1. Government scientists actually published
their data, see at the top of this page. No government, scientist or
university has ever stated any doubt about the published findings. |
|
|
|
|
|
3. The presence of tritium, otherwise
unexplained, would prove that the towers fell through nuclear devices (not
Hiroshima type bombs, but smaller devices with easier detonation mechanisms). |
|
|
|
|
|
4. The report cited above fails in its cover-up
strategy: The alleged planes and their luminous EXIT signs are no credible
source for the extra tritium. |
|
|
|
|
|
Why? |
|
|
|
|
|
There are two good reasons: |
|
|
|
|
|
One: Two: |
When planes and passengers and their
entire luggage vaporize in a fireball, the hydrogen (tritium is a form of
hydrogen) of the EXIT signs vaporizes together with the rest, and is gone
through the atmosphere. Why would tritiated water trickle down into the
basement for measurement but not a single trace of any passenger blood, of
which millions of times more was shed than tritiated water could have been
created?? There were no planes, but only
make-believe theater props copied or otherwise operated into the news videos of
the alleged planes. This has been established beyond reasonable doubt by
numerous 9-11 researchers, see summary in the following items: Marcus Icke Ghost Gun UA175, Holograms
Whistleblowers and the 9-11 Media Hoax, http://www.gallerize.com/2005-01-11_001_MI_SG_UA175.htm
For the entire context of the
media hoax see additional information at: http://www.gallerize.com/911_home.htm
Scroll down to the end of the page
for link to my huge 9-11 download center. |
|
SUMMARY: For two good reasons (each one
standing valid for itself), there is no explanation for the tritium in the
WTC other than nuclear devices. Unlike at the OKC bombing, the tritium
findings themselves are actually admitted and reported by the government, and
there is no credible explanation for them to worm their way out. |
|
|
|
|
|
References with further links: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|